
Visual automation platform with 1000+ integrations, AI tools module, and powerful data transformation capabilities.
Watch Make (Integromat) demos & reviews
Search on YouTubeMake, formerly known as Integromat, is a visually-oriented automation platform that enables complex, multi-step workflows through an intuitive drag-and-drop scenario builder. Where many automation tools are limited to simple if-this-then-that logic, Make handles sophisticated data transformation operations, filtering, mapping, aggregating, and routing data across dozens of applications in a single scenario. Its AI tools module connects directly to OpenAI, Google AI, and other machine learning services, enabling users to build AI-augmented workflows without coding. With over 1,000 app integrations spanning productivity tools, e-commerce platforms, marketing systems, and developer services, Make can automate virtually any cross-platform business process. The HTTP module handles custom API calls to services not yet in the app directory. Data stores provide persistent storage within scenarios, enabling stateful workflows. Team workspaces with collaborative editing support agency and enterprise use cases. At $10/month for the Core plan, Make delivers exceptional value for businesses looking to automate repetitive work without investing in expensive enterprise middleware.
Make (Integromat) is useful but inconsistent. Sometimes the output is brilliant, other times it misunderstands context entirely. For routine tasks it's fine, but I find myself double-checking important outputs more than I'd like.
Make (Integromat) is miles ahead of where it was a year ago. The coding assistance is excellent โ full refactors with explanations, edge case awareness, and it understands our codebase style quickly. Game changer for our dev team.
Make (Integromat) replaced several specialized tools in our workflow. Content creation, summarization, competitive analysis โ the quality is consistently high and it's rare to get hallucinations on factual topics.
Make (Integromat) is useful but inconsistent. Sometimes the output is brilliant, other times it misunderstands context entirely. For routine tasks it's fine, but I find myself double-checking important outputs more than I'd like.